Experimental Film Society · Homo Sapiens Project

Homo Sapiens Project, Volume 3

As part of the Homo Sapiens Project · comprising instalments 21–30

Still from Homo Sapiens Project, Volume 3

The Installments

Homo Sapiens Project 212011 · 9 min 23 sec

A face pressed close to the lens, half-consumed by a violet flare that behaves like weather.

Homo Sapiens Project 222011 · 8 min 24 sec

A pond overexposed to white, its single dark ripple opening in the water like an eye.

Homo Sapiens Project 232011 · 7 min 3 sec

In sepia, a figure recedes down an industrial street beneath gantries, framed like salvaged newsreel.

Homo Sapiens Project 242011 · 5 min 56 sec

Two figures pause at the crest of a scratched hillside path, the emulsion raining around them.

Homo Sapiens Project 252011 · 5 min 32 sec

A branch of blossom against darkness, each flower burning as a small unfocused lamp.

Homo Sapiens Project 262011 · 9 min 31 sec

A congress of pigeons in silhouette along a ridge, holding session beneath a mottled sky.

Homo Sapiens Project 272011 · 6 min 45 sec

Figures drowned in green — faces surfacing and dissolving inside the texture as if underwater.

Homo Sapiens Project 282011 · 12 min 16 sec

On a checkerboard floor the film set shows itself: tripod, crew, and a woman rehearsing her apparition.

Homo Sapiens Project 292011 · 12 min 20 sec

A bare mattress in an amber room; a man crosses toward the one door that is lit.

Homo Sapiens Project 302011 · 29 min 44 sec

A suited man smokes against a pale wall, composed like a portrait waiting for its interrogation.

This film is available directly from the filmmaker — pay what you wish · download & own →
TitleHomo Sapiens Project, Volume 3
A film byRouzbeh Rashidi
Year2011
Country of productionIran / Ireland
GenreExperimental
FormatVarious
LanguageEnglish
Duration107 minutes
ProductionExperimental Film Society
Funding bodiesSelf-funded

Synopsis

The Homo Sapiens Project is less a body of films than a single, unclosing organism of moving images — a laboratory in which cinema is turned upon itself and made to ask what it can think, feel, and reveal once relieved of story, psychology, and the sovereignty of the human eye. Perception itself becomes the reagent: sound and image are laid down first, and sense is allowed to drift outward from them rather than be illustrated into them. Time does not advance toward resolution but thickens into duration, an elliptical present that loops and returns until the frame ceases to point beyond itself and simply is — a living cell of reality, luminous and opaque at once. Through it moves a gaze that is not quite human, an impersonal, almost extraterrestrial attention that surveys flesh, landscape, architecture, and light with cold fascination, until the familiar turns eerie and the human dwindles to one object among objects. What it offers is not knowledge stated but knowledge undergone — dread, trance, rapture, the shock of darkness broken by sudden light — a passage through matter, memory, and hallucination in which narrative certainty dissolves and something older and stranger surfaces in its place. It is filmmaking as a parallel to living: a thinking-through of cinema conducted at the very limits of what the image can hold.

Director’s Statement

The Homo Sapiens Project is the distillation and, in some measure, the culmination of Rouzbeh Rashidi’s cinema. The director approaches the moving image as a laboratory and each work as an experiment in which his own perception and inner life are employed as a reagent. He begins not with a story to be told but with sound and image, working intuitively outward toward ideas and treating the making of images as exploration rather than illustration — a practice deeply engaged with the history and material of film, yet bent on collapsing the boundary between alienated subjective perception and the inexhaustible mysteriousness of the moving image.

His method is a sustained withdrawal from the securities of narrative cinema. Rashidi refuses illustration, psychology, dramatic explanation, and the reassurances of conventional narration, pursuing instead a ground zero of drama in which the image is stripped of its obligation to mean. Time is emptied of teleology and given over to duration — elliptical, recursive, held open — so that each frame is released from the demand to lead somewhere and permitted to exist for itself. Meaning is never delivered; it is deposited, and crystallises, if at all, in the act of viewing.

At the centre of the work is a gaze that is not centred on the human at all. The camera becomes an impersonal, quasi-autonomous intelligence — an alien vantage that studies bodies, faces, landscapes, and machines without entering into their motives, until the everyday is estranged and rendered eerie. The human figure, the director’s own included, appears not as the bearer of meaning but as one object among objects, absorbed into the immanent texture of the image. The frame asserts its own ontology: not a window onto reality but a plane of reality itself, matter and light left to think on their own terms.

These films do not convey ideas so much as embody them. They act upon the viewer through affect and sensation — dread, trance, rapture, the visceral force of grain, flicker, and drone, the alternation of darkness with sudden, overexposing light. The knowledge they yield is corporeal and processual, undergone rather than stated. Working across an unusually wide range of imaging instruments, from obsolete analogue apparatus to the most advanced digital and optical devices, Rashidi treats each technology as an organ of perception, a means of testing what the image can register at the threshold of human legibility.

Taken whole, the Homo Sapiens Project is filmmaking conceived as a parallel to living — not a life filmed, but a thinking-through of cinema that runs alongside existence. It is an open and unclosing inquiry into what film can become when driven to its limits: a cinema that does not depict a philosophy from outside but generates one immanently, through montage, light, duration, and sound. Its wager is that the image can always think more, feel more, and reveal more — that the limits of cinema have not yet been tested enough.